<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: literally kicks the bucket</title>
	<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/</link>
	<description>An English language grammar blog tracking abuse of the word "literally"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fitz</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>They are not using the figurative meaning (that he died) but the literal meaning (he kicked a bucket with his foot), but they could have said "when his character dies" if you want to be pedantic (and hey, who doesn't)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not using the figurative meaning (that he died) but the literal meaning (he kicked a bucket with his foot), but they could have said &#8220;when his character dies&#8221; if you want to be pedantic (and hey, who doesn&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rone</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>rone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 23:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I don't know if i'd call that correct usage, since Durante didn't (literally) die &#8212; his character did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if i&#8217;d call that correct usage, since Durante didn&#8217;t (literally) die &mdash; his character did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Literally confused</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Literally confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Ah sorry, my mistake. I didn't read the site that carefully when I posted that. I think you're right however, calling out the distinction a little more prominently might be called for. 

Here's a new one for the incorrect category, just on Slate now, in an article by Sam  Anderson: 

"The range of material on the Web site YouTube is almost literally incredible— "

Link below. Now, if you'll excuse me, I shall go and play "My Mistake", for solo violin.

http://www.slate.com/id/2140697/nav/tap1/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah sorry, my mistake. I didn&#8217;t read the site that carefully when I posted that. I think you&#8217;re right however, calling out the distinction a little more prominently might be called for. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a new one for the incorrect category, just on Slate now, in an article by Sam  Anderson: </p>
<p>&#8220;The range of material on the Web site YouTube is almost literally incredible— &#8221;</p>
<p>Link below. Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I shall go and play &#8220;My Mistake&#8221;, for solo violin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2140697/nav/tap1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2140697/nav/tap1/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitz</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>This is not misuse - it's filed under correct. I'll try to make this more clear in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not misuse - it&#8217;s filed under correct. I&#8217;ll try to make this more clear in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Literally confused</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Literally confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Why is this "misuse"? The point here was that Durante kicks a real bucket, that's the gag. Thus it's not the usual figurative use of the term "to kick the bucket", meaning to die, but a well, literal one. 

Your own description of "what's the problem" gives the "acceptable" usage of literal as one that's not figurative but... the other kind. Literal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this &#8220;misuse&#8221;? The point here was that Durante kicks a real bucket, that&#8217;s the gag. Thus it&#8217;s not the usual figurative use of the term &#8220;to kick the bucket&#8221;, meaning to die, but a well, literal one. </p>
<p>Your own description of &#8220;what&#8217;s the problem&#8221; gives the &#8220;acceptable&#8221; usage of literal as one that&#8217;s not figurative but&#8230; the other kind. Literal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Tidwell</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Tidwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2006/03/26/literally-kicks-the-bucket/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>two words
Ethel Merman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two words<br />
Ethel Merman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
