<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: literally left no stone unturned</title>
	<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2005/12/12/literally-left-no-stone-unturned/</link>
	<description>An English language grammar blog tracking abuse of the word "literally"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken R.</title>
		<link>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2005/12/12/literally-left-no-stone-unturned/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://literally.barelyfitz.com/2005/12/12/literally-left-no-stone-unturned/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>It's one thing to use the term inappropriately instead of using "actually" or "without exaggeration", but to use it in the exact opposite way from which it should be used is troubling. Just pick up some other affectation already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one thing to use the term inappropriately instead of using &#8220;actually&#8221; or &#8220;without exaggeration&#8221;, but to use it in the exact opposite way from which it should be used is troubling. Just pick up some other affectation already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
