Comments on: literally gave birth

By: Ken

Ken — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:03:04 +0000

I know I’m really late with this, but I just discovered this cite by cabbey and was a bit amused about the irony of his/her misspelling of the word “grammar” in his/her comment about the punctuation used in the original article.

By: Fitz

Fitz — Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:13:02 +0000

@cabbey: both forms are valid, it’s a matter of “house style”. For example, the AP uses “Davis’” and the Chicago Manual of Style uses “Davis’s”. I was taught the former use, but I think I like the latter use better as it is unambiguous and more closely matches the pronunciation.

By: cabbey

cabbey — Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:50:39 +0000

Should not that be “William Davisâ€™ Lincolnâ€™s Men” instead? It is a bit ironic to find a goof like that on a blog about grammer.

By: Fitz

Fitz — Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:14:05 +0000

I just had to do this one right away, because photoshopping Abraham Lincoln’s head onto a pregnant woman sounded like so much fun.